Financial Articles |
Yield, Safety & Liquidity In recent years, reserve planning has become a long overdue reality for many older homeowner associations. The boom and bust mentality of deferred maintenance and special assessments has finally been replaced with proper long range planning and funding. For all of them, that meant accumulation of hundreds of thousands of dollars and for some, millions. With the reserve fund growth comes the need for better reserve fund management (also known as good stewardship). With wise stewardship, member contributions are substantially reduced due to the miracle of compound interest. With properly applied investment principles, even a modest condominium of 50 units can generate several hundred thousand dollars in interest earnings over a 30 year projection period. This means that the members will need to contribute that much less out of their pockets. Good news indeed. The board of directors has a fiduciary responsibility to make sure reserve funds are invested properly and safely. The board should not invest in anything that a prudent person would consider risky unless there is a broad consensus among the members that doing so is okay (better get that in writing). The investment strategy should also ensure that funds are available when needed. To refine and define the HOA’s reserve obligations, a written Reserves Funding & Investment Policy is extremely important (for a sample, see the Reserve Planning section). That policy holds both current and future boards to a standard of accountability and helps prevent the Board from using reserves like a private piggy bank. A good Reserve Plan puts the funding issue in proper perspective. While, say, $50,000 or more may seem to be a lot of money to an individual, it’s a pittance to an HOA when it comes to paying for major repairs and replacements like roofing, painting, siding and paving. Most reserve plans call for the accumulation of hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars. Even though the fund size seem large, it is rarely greater than what is necessary to cover real costs. To stay accurate, the Reserve Study must be updated annually to ensure that the HOA is on track and being adequately funded. When the Reserve Study is funded properly, more money will result (Oh Joy!) but with that money comes the responsibility to invest it wisely. A Reserve Funding & Investment Policy will provide the philosophy but it’s up to the Board to see that the philosophy is implemented. The larger the fund, the greater the need for investment expertise. While your banker will doubtless have some convenient options, that convenience may be very costly since it can come with a below market rate of return. A trained investments consultant can be hired to manage the reserve funds and maximize yields through safe and insured investments. If your reserve funds are substantial, this is a wise and profitable move. The added investment return will more than pay for the cost of the consultant. Investment yield is directly related to the size of fund being invested. The more you have, the greater the yield. However, some banks don’t willingly offer their customers the better rates. As a matter of fact, your bank may not be the best place to invest reserves. For the best rates, you need to go shopping. Next stop, the internet. Bankrate.com is one of several online sources for local investment alternatives. You can search by state and city to locate higher CD rates right in your locale. Fiduciary responsibility requires that directors handle reserves responsibility. When it comes to investing there are three considerations: safety, liquidity and yield. Safety can be broken down into two categories: safety of income and safety of principal. Safety of income measures the likelihood that anticipated income from an investment will continue to be paid in the amount expected and at the time expected. Safety of principal refers to whether the principal value of the investment available at the outset will be available at maturity. Both categories of safety can vary in degree with specific investments. Liquidity refers to investments that can be converted quickly into cash. Homeowner associations need a certain amount of liquid funds because major repairs can happen unexpectedly. However, with a proper Reserve Study, most repair events can be accurately predicted years in advance. If the repair schedule indicates 95% of reserves won’t be needed for three years, those funds can be obligated for at least two years with little fear of being caught short. Yield is simply the return received on the investment. Generally, the longer the maturity period, the higher the yield. So, a three year CD yields more than a one year CD. Also, the safer the investment, the lower the yield. A well planned reserves investment policy factors safety, liquidity and yield into the mix. These are the basics of good stewardship. When the reserves are funded according to a 100% funding philosophy coupled with these basics, the HOA will find a firm financial foundation for the future. BACK
Boy Scout the IRS HOAs may file taxes using either a Form1120-H (designed for HOAs and carries a taxrate of 30%) or Form 1120 (designed for corporations and carries a taxrate of 15-39%). The form issue becomes more relevant depending how the HOA deals with operating funds that otherwise might be taxable income, such as a cash settlement from a construction defect lawsuit. IRS Revenue Ruling 70-604 allows an HOA to exclude excess membership income from taxation by returning the excess to its members. The HOA can make an annual election to return the excess either by refunding the excess to the members or applying it to the next year's homeowner fees. Documenting the HOA's specific action is essential. If the IRS can find no written record of the roll over election by the HOA members (not the board) made prior to the filing of the year's tax return, they may conclude that the funds are fully taxable. So, every HOA that has excess taxable funds should adopt a resolution at the annual meeting. Using the 1120-H method is easy and poses little risk of an audit. The HOA simply refunds each unit owner's share of the excess membership income. However, using 1120 to report the roll over of excess funds from one year to the next is especially prone to IRS inquiries. The HOA should make sure that the amount rolled over is absorbed in the following year. In some cases, the HOA may treat part of it as a contribution to reserves. To do so, it must meet the following criteria:
If you report interest income on the HOA's tax return, assume the IRS will be keenly interested in what expenses were allocated against it, and in other nonexempt or nonmember income to lower the taxes due. The IRS demands thorough records to substantiate expense allocation against various types of income. Consider an HOA with that, say, rents out the clubhouse to nonmembers for a fee. The IRS will require that these HOAs explain the basis for expense allocations (like, hours of janitorial services). IRS Audits will review the following:
When selecting a property manager or accountants, make sure they are familiar with applicable IRS rules which are continuously evolving. Your property manager needs to know how to allocate various expenses so your HOA can properly compute its taxable income and file the return. Reduce the chance of an audit: If the IRS audits your HOA: Leave adequate time to prepare. Scrutinize the audit notice to determine the various financial records that will be needed for the review process. Usually the IRS will reschedule to a more convenient time if you ask them to do so. Hire an accountant to handle the audit. Those who prepared the tax return are most familiar with the return under review, and usually have prior experience with IRS audits. Provide complete records to the accountant. The sooner the accountant receives the records, the better. So there you have it. Boy scouts are drilled in the discipline of preparedness because one never knows what the future will bring. But those that are prepared generally can avoid the avoidable and IRS audits usually fall into this category. Those that pass this test qualify for the Audit Avoidance Merit Badge. BACK
Hand in the Cookie Jar From time to time, these stories hit the local rag and the really big ones make national news. While embezzlers can be found in virtually every type of business, homeowner associations are not immune. In fact, because of the volunteer nature of HOAs, business practices tend to be somewhat lax and HOAs are even more vulnerable than traditional businesses. In the past, big time embezzlement was less likely because most HOAs had little money to steal. It was like mugging a panhandler. What was more likely to happen is something like board members buying themselves dinner or other perks on the HOA’s dime. Those so engaged view it as a legitimate expense for a volunteer position. Trouble is, since directors usually serve for no compensation (see your governing documents) and there is rarely a budget line item called "Board Perks", this is just another form of petty embezzlement. Like Enron, this kind takes collusion of the board members to keep the practice alive. With reserve planning for homeowners on the rise (thankfully) comes increased amounts of cash which can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars. With larger amounts of cash comes the unfortunate temptation to dip into the HOA’s cookie jar. Embezzlement can happen by either a board member or management company that has access to the funds. Usually, managers are restricted (or should be) from reserve accounts where most of the HOA’s money is. This leaves the HOA cookie jar under the control of the Board President and Treasurer.When it comes to protecting against embezzlement and other forms of fraud, it’s best to have a number of controls in place that are designed to preempt the act. In other words, if there is a good chance an embezzler is going to get caught, the temptation is much less than if stealing is a piece of cake. Some of the basic controls include:
Getting caught with a hand in a cookie jar is no big thing if you’re five years old and the goal is a macaroon. But when the prize is the HOA’s cash, the Board needs to place aggressive measures in place to help keep those "certain someones" from helping themselves. BACK
A Chilling Effect Among the new guidelines is a requirement that no more than 15% of the units may be delinquent for one month or more in the payment of common expenses. In addition, Fannie Mae requires that the local lender certify that the condominium budget is "adequate" and that there is a line item in the budget for reserves of at least 10% of the annual revenues. Fannie Mae continues to be concerned about litigation which might materially affect the financial health of the condominium association. The concern about litigation relates to cases where the homeowners association is either plaintiff or defendant. Collection lawsuits, however, do not disqualify the association from complying with Fannie Mae guidelines. Since the only parties subject to Fannie Mae’s guidelines are the local lenders, one might question how the new guidelines directly affect condominium associations. Fannie Mae buys a substantial number of loans from local lenders and so compliance with Fannie Mae’s guidelines may determine whether unit owners sell or refinance their units. The impact is profound. In the past, local lenders were more relaxed in complying with Fannie Mae guidelines. Now, it appears that they have are more compliant because the lender may be required to buy back loans if they fail to meet Fannie Mae’s underwriting guidelines. In one case, a small twelve unit condominium completed a lender affidavit form in connection with a loan to a new purchaser which stated that four out of the twelve units were delinquent (25%) by more than one month in the payment of common expenses. Since the delinquency rate exceeded Fannie Mae’s 15% maximum, the lender rejected the loan. In another instance, a lender affidavit form reported that the condominium was a plaintiff in a construction defect lawsuit against the developer. The lender rejected the loan because of the possible financial impact on their borrower. In the third case, the association was the defendant in a discrimination claim brought by a unit owner. Although the master insurance policy was defending the claim, the master insurer only agreed to pay legal defense fees but would not pay if there was a money judgment after a trial. Although the lawsuit settled quickly for a small sum, the lender had already rejected the loan. These cases pose real concerns to condominium associations. In the case of delinquencies, associations should have and consistently enforce written collection procedures. For example, after ten days, a late charge should be charged and the unit owner advised of the delinquency. There should then be a procedure for subsequent notices and deadline when the collection will be subject to more aggressive measures (liens, wage garnishment, etc.) by the association attorney. The issue of litigation is more complicated. It makes little sense for an association suffering from construction defects not to bring the suit for fear lenders would stop lending. In the matter of the discrimination claim, the association is forced to defend itself even if the lawsuit is frivolous. While there are grave concerns relating to the rejection of condominium loans, in the three matters discussed here, the borrower simply went to another lender who did lend the money. However, with a banking system in crisis and lenders complying with stricter Fannie Mae guidelines, there will be a certain chilling effect which will prove interesting for condominium associations. By Stephen M. Marcus, Esq. of Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks P.C. BACK
End of Life Issues The end of life of common elements in a homeowner association (HOA) can be traumatic to the board, owners and management, especially when there is no reserve study. When major components must be replaced, the special assessment letters that go out are seldom anticipated. One of the most difficult challenges that HOAs face is dealing with physical obsolescence. HOAs that are 30-40 years old are struggling with deteriorating condition. Regardless of the quality of the regular maintenance program, the time ultimately arrives maintenance money is being wasted and major repairs or replacements must be made. How HOAs come to terms with these end of life issues are described by Elisabeth Kubler-Ross in her book "Death and Dying", which include denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. Knowing that the HOA will experience these stages can make it easier for boards and managers to work to a more successful outcome. Denial. Many boards focus on operation costs in the early years and give little thought to future repairs. Although the board has a fiduciary duty in this regard, there is often relentless pressure from owners to keep fees artificially low to stay competitive with other HOAs. Faced with increases in the annual cost of services, reducing or eliminating contributions to long-term capital reserves is often the path of least resistance to hold off fee increases. However, when a major component fails, there are no funds to replace it and the cost must be paid by special assessment.The board often buries its head in the sands of denial with statements like "If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it" and "Just put a Band-Aid on it". The manager must continually remind the board about the consequences of aging components. Commissioning a reserve study provides a framework for scheduling work and reserve funding goals. The reserve study should also be communicated to unit owners at a special meeting. Anger. As condominiums approach middle-age, boards are faced with hard decisions. The manager is often the bearer of the bad news and sometimes the board suffers a lapse of memory about previous warnings. They know that special assessments will not be well received and go to great lengths to avoid approving them. Blaming someone else for the problem like the builder or manager will be a temporary distraction but without money, special assessments are the most realistic solution. This is also a good time to enact a plan of increasing fees to build up the reserve fund to avoid special assessments in the future. Bargaining. Bargaining is a common tactic by members who try to forestall expensive repairs. Those tactics include filing injunctions against the board to stall the process. Other tactics include roofs can be patched, less expensive systems can be bought, the low bid is the best choice or that the repairs should be postponed. Or, a friend in the industry has suggested that the HOA is being taken to the cleaners. The board may also try to negotiate the useful life of components. Managers can cave into such board pressure but inevitably, the components will fail and often at the least opportune. Consider a boiler failure in mid-winter, when emergency replacement will be much more costly than a scheduled replacement. Depression. Owners are emotionally involved in decisions that affect their homes. But unlike single family home owners, HOA owners do not directly control the decision-making process. The feeling of powerlessness can be overwhelming and result in depression. Empowering owners by sharing the long-term repair strategy will help counter the feeling of powerlessness. The board can distribute information explaining the issues and asking for input if meetings cannot be held. Informing unit owners in advance allows them to plan for the upcoming costs. Participating in the process will go a long way in easing a transition to acceptance. Acceptance. Ultimately, the repairs must be done. The board has the responsibility to maintain the common elements and must make the tough decisions that are in the best interests of the homeowners association. However, gaining owner acceptance is key in maintaining harmony and good relations. To achieve this goal as painlessly as possible, the board should adopt and follow a properly prepared reserve study so that the HOA will be ready for the inevitable end of life issues. By Patricia Brawley of Community Solutions. This article is reprinted with permission of Condo Media Magazine, the official publication of the CAI New England Chapter. BACK
2009 FHA Condo Financing Rules Due to the high number of condominiums currently available for sale and the low interest rates, this should be a great time to buy a condominium. But starting in 2008, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FHA decided to tighten their standards and reduce their risk exposure to the condo market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are typically the organizations that supply a secondary market to banks. Banks lend to you and then they turn around and sell their loans to one of these markets. An FHA loan is a loan insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). The loan itself is issued by federally qualified lenders. FHA allows first time home buyers to put down as little as 3% and receive up to 6% towards closing costs. But on December 7, 2009, FHA implemented new rules for condominium financing that made it very difficult for properties to qualify for financing and become FHA approved. The New FHA Rules 1. Due to noise concerns, FHA financing will be unavailable for properties that are within:
2. FHA financing will be unavailable to properties located within 2,000 feet of any facility handling or storing explosive or fire prone materials like a:
3. FHA loans are not available if a property is located within 300 feet of dump, landfill or Superfund clean-up site (like the Willamette River in Portland, Oregon) 4. Projects in designated wetlands and flood zones will not qualify. 5. Not more than 25% of the property's total floor area can be used for commercial purposes. 6. No more than 10% of the units can be owned by one investor. 7. No more than 15% of the total units can be more than 30 days past due on their homeowner association fees. 8. For newly constructed units, at least 50% of the total units must be sold prior to any endorsement of any mortgage. 9. More than 50% of the units must be sold to owner occupants. 10. Properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places will have a hard time getting financing. 11. Projects consisting of four or more units will not be allowed to have more than 30% of the total units encumbered with FHA insurance. 12. A current reserve study must be performed to assure that adequate funds are available for funding of capital expenses and maintenance. A reserve study can be no more than 12 months old. 13. These rules also include the requirement for an affirmative action-type housing plan, for new construction and conversions over 5 units. This plan requires that the racial, socioeconomic and ethnic composition of the condominium residents closely mirror that of the neighboring areas. Impact on Buyers: As long as you have cash or at least 20% down these rules will not affect you. On the other hand, if you are a buyer with a very low down payment this will shrink considerably the number of properties available to you for purchase. Impact on Condominium Owners: If you want to sell, you will be faced with a shrinking pool of buyers. And if your property is located on a major road artery or in a downtown area, close to a river or a lake, kiss FHA financing goodbye. Impact on Condominium Associations: Boards of directors will be faced with the task of meeting these requirements if they can, to preserve their position as an FHA approved property and to obtain financing for at least 30% of the owners. If owners cannot sell their properties that increases the potential that they might let them be foreclosed. Who will benefit? Historically, condominiums have been the springboard to home ownership. The new FHA rules will make it more difficult for first time home buyers and may further slow the pace of condo development and absorption. Historic, waterfront and downtown condominium communities will be the most challenged by the new FHA rules due to location. Conversely, the sagging urban markets may struggle due to the higher delinquency rates. In the short run apartment owners and banks will benefit as entry level buyers will only be able to buy foreclosed homes or continue to rent. It is not until the real estate market stabilizes and home prices start to increase that we can expect FHA to relax its rules. In the mean time, condominium developers will have to find alternative financing. In some cases the developers will agree to short term contracts, where they carry the financing. But cash will be king and low income buyers will be priced out of the market. The ability to purchase a condominium with a down payment of less than 20% is evaporating quickly. There may be a time where no one can benefit, the buyer cannot find financing, the seller can't sell, the banks don't want a flood of condominiums that they will have to manage, and HOA boards are scrambling to maintain the commons with dwindling budgets. Once this occurs political pressures will pressure the agency to adjust their policies. The question is: Can condominium owners wait that long? By Clifford Hockley BACK
Avoiding the Avoidable It began when 13 units were flooded due to a sewer backup. A meeting was arranged for all of the displaced residents, the insurance adjuster and a contractor. As expected, the residents were quite upset and could not understand why they were not being allowed access to their own homes. The necessary treatment of sewage water was explained to the residents along with the fact that they would not be able to return to their homes for six to eight weeks. Tempers flared when the board further informed them that they would have to pay for their own lodging until renovation was complete. After considerable angry words were exchanged, the board decided to advance the lodging costs hoping that the insurance would reimburse the HOA. And rather than wait for a commitment from the insurance company, funds for repairs were taken from reserves. A few months later, three units in a totally different area were flooded by another sewer back up. The contractors who were still working on the original 13 units were called in to dry out the flooded areas and start remediation. The insurance company was once again contacted and the entire claim process began on these three additional units. Within six more weeks, a main water line burst and 44 units were flooded with approximately 12 inches of water in each unit. This included the last three units that were still displaced from the sewer backup. This time, fortunately, the water line actually belonged to the City and the City was called in to repair the line that ruptured. The city's insurance company, as well as the HOA's insurance company were contacted. The same contractor, who was still working on-site, as well as two other general contractors, were brought in to dry the units. This time all of the units were taken completely down to the framing, including removal of all cabinets, carpets and flooring. Although the HOA was fortunate to have adequate insurance to most of the repairs, the reserve fund was tapped for the rest. But there was more...While doing a weekly maintenance inspection, holes were observed in the stucco walls that seemed to be the result of vandalism. The holes revealed some mysterious black substance in the structure which turned out to be dry rot. Reports started coming into the management office regarding cantilevered decks that had dropped 1-2 inches. The health and safety of affected residents was of great concern. The board hired a structural engineer to study the walls and decks and to make recommendations for repairs. Bids were obtained from four different engineering companies and a contract was awarded to the low bidder at $56,000. After a thorough investigation, over a dozen decks were immediately placed off limits to their residents due to unsafe conditions. The study further revealed dry rot and mold behind the walls where the small holes had been made. It was thought that some of the water was from leaks in the roofs, bad drainage from the roofs and from holes drilled in the walls by the TV cable company to access individual units. Further, the exterior walls were covered with an elastomeric paint, which did not allow water to evaporate when it got behind stucco. But there was still more...Because of the moisture, termites were having a picnic on the structure. A termite specialist was brought in and the treatment of all buildings came in at just over $100,000. Tree roots were also getting into the sewer lines. Many lines were so impacted that they had to be replaced. When the board finally received the completed report from the engineer, the property was in need of repairs totaling $18,000,000, none of which was covered by insurance. Because of the lack of reserve funds, it took four years before the repairs could be accomplished. This sad tale illustrates that a properly done reserve study, adequate reserve funds and regular preventive maintenance is essential to preventing disaster. The moral of the story: Avoid the avoidable. Article from Association Times. For a list of qualified reserve study providers, see Association of Professional Reserve Analysts at www.apra-usa.com BACK
Collection Policy Scorecard 1. Policy states that a
delinquent owner is responsible for payment of late fees for every month an
account is delinquent. Yes No Grading Key: (Number of Yes Circled) 15-19 Collection Policy is
efficient. by Amelia J. Adair, Esq. of www.HindmanSanchez.com BACK
4 Reserve Investment Hurdles Hurdle #1: Failure to use the Reserve Study or not having one in the first place. Homeowner association boards have the duty to conduct long range planning to identify common elements, their current condition, their useful lives and current cost of repair or replacement. This exercise is called a Reserve Study. Some boards believe that a reserve study provides little benefit except to point out the obvious. These same boards either elect not to pay the cost of one or put the one they have in a file to gather dust. Both approaches are foolish because without a clear road map to follow, the board is bound to get lost in the maze. Properly funding reserves for the standard 30 year projection period could amount to many hundreds of thousands of dollars. Larger HOAs with extensive common elements should reserve millions. Failure to fund reserves adequately results in unfair and sometimes uncollectible special assessments. Prudent investment of reserve funds could partially offset member contributions and reduce the risk of special assessments. Hurdle #2: Failure to understand investment choices. Some boards are under the impression that FDIC insured money market accounts or CDs are the only alternatives for reserve fund investments. There are a number of alternatives. State laws vary but in Oregon, for example, HOAs are limited to direct investment in issues of the federal Government and/or FDIC bank accounts or CDs. HOAs are not permitted to invest in municipalities, mutual funds or indirect investments (investments to which the investor does not directly hold title, such as mutual funds, limited partnerships and Real Estate Investment Trusts). Non-FDIC insured money market accounts are not to be used for homeowner association reserve investments by law. This creates an opportunity to invest in longer term federal bonds. As of the writing of this article, the going rate of a 10 year government bond is around 2.91% compared with bank checking accounts that average around 0.5%. This increased yield could go a long way to reducing the need for a special assessment. The challenge with investing in 10 year bonds is determining how much should be invested in them. Fortunately, the Reserve Study is very useful in determining the short and long term reserve cash needs. Hurdle #3: Failure to utilize the Reserve Study when selecting investments. The first step in considering higher yielding investment opportunities is to put that Reserve Study to work. The Reserve Study can be used to match the repair schedule with the investments. This allows combining shorter term/lower yield CDs with longer term/higher yield Treasury Bills. This type of investment strategy is called a Duration Study. Even though a Duration Study costs money to perform, the extra interest return that can be earned by matching the investment duration to your specific HOA is well worth it. Duration studies and the investment mix need to be redone every time a Reserve Study is updated. Hurdle #4: Not hiring a fiduciary. Regardless of how the board chooses to invest the HOA's Reserve Funds, time, expertise and professional ability are needed to manage them properly. It is in the board’s interest to find someone that has the HOA’s well being at heart, such as an investment advisory company that is a fiduciary to the board. By better managing your reserve funds, you avoid the hurdles described and improve reserve investment yields. Leave the hurdling to the track stars. Use a trained financial consultant to optimize your reserve fund investments. By William Meyer, CEO - Strategic Group www.reservefundinvestments.com BACK |
© Copyright by Regenesis.net
All rights reserved