Management Articles |
Slicing
the Amenity Pie The board should never allow exclusive use of a limited amenity without payment of rent to the association. If the association is fortunate enough to have income generating property, the Board should rent it out based on local commercial storage and parking rates. Renting below market rate may fill the spaces but loses valuable income that could reduce monthly assessments for everyone. This is particularly critical when demand is high. The association can justify charging market rate because of the convenient location. While rental terms can be month to month, the usually small rent and greater likelihood of vacancies makes it more practical to require a one year lease. This is particularly true of RV parking where renters would only pay part of the year if they could, leaving an unpaid vacancy while they travel. Renting a year at a time ensures a steady income stream for the association. And if the monthly rent is small, it’s wise to collect for the full year to reduce monthly bookkeeping tasks. When supply exceeds demand, some owners may be allowed to rent more than one space. However, when demand exceeds supply, the Board has the right to terminate the multiple space renters on their anniversary date to allow other owners to rent. Reapportioning limited amenities when demand exceeds supply is only fair. No owner should have a greater right than another. Finally, under most circumstances, association amenities should not be rented to non-owners. If an owner defaults on the rent payment or causes damage, money can be recouped by liening the owner’s association property if necessary. The association has no such rights with non-owners. Slicing the amenity pie can be problematic when demand is high. Rather than waiting for the kids to fight over the last piece, draft a resolution outlining the procedure, circulate it to the owners for review, revise as needed, formally adopt it at a board meeting and distribute it to all owners. BACK
Board
Wake Up Call Monthly fees should be kept low. The Board is elected to maintain the association assets properly. There is a big difference between being a good steward and a tightwad. Tightwads skip routine and necessary maintenance services which erode the value of the homes. It takes money to do it right and the Board should spend the money necessary to accomplish the tasks. Volunteer boards aren’t held to the same standards as professional managers. Volunteers maybe, but charged with running HOA business in an informed and business like manner. This means taking care of things in a timely manner, planning ahead to anticipate problems, getting and acting on good advice. The association is small and so are the needs. The smaller the HOA, the more important planning is since the cost per owner goes up the smaller the association is. We’re too small for professional management. In areas like financial management and rules enforcement, all associations should have outside professionals. Collecting money from neighbors and controlling their antisocial behavior is bound to cause problems for the person doing it. It’s even worse when you live next to the offender. There are management professionals that do these tasks 24/7. The board is elected to be the manager. The board is elected to hire and supervise competent service providers. If properly organized, the board’s job should usually take only a few hours a month. The board is entrusted with the most valuable asset most people own. The responsibilities of an HOA board are not unlike those of any Fortune 500 company board. In both cases, there are physical and human assets entrusted to the board. Careful planning and effective communication to the stockholders (owners) is needed. Is your board asleep to the true scope of the job? Is so, heed this wake up call. BACK
Directors &
Officers 101 Fiduciary duties imposed upon board members include two components, undivided loyalty and reasonable business judgment. Undivided loyalty means that each board member must act in the best interest of the association. For example, a board member should vote for a needed increase in assessment or for greater reserves even though the board member personally can’t afford it. Similarly, a board member should vote for matters that are necessary or appropriate even though some owners do not agree. Reasonable business judgment in conducting the affairs of the association is the second requirement of director fiduciary duty. Each director must understand the association business, actively participate, determine what is required for the association to operate, and then vote prudently. For example, securing three proposals on a project is not mandated by law. However, it is a reasonable method to determine a fair price to pay for work. It’s also reasonable to get competent advice in areas that require expertise. Engineering, architecture, law and reserve planning are all areas that require a high level of training to do well. The board is not elected to guess at highly complex issues but to use prudent judgment based on competent input. While that input may cost money, the consequences of uninformed decisions are usually much more costly. In addition to these fiduciary standards, the board is responsible to:
Board officers are usually appointed by the directors themselves. The directors vote on all contracts and policies while officers execute specific duties authorized by the governing documents and the directors. Each association should have at least a President, Secretary and Treasurer. President. Conducts board and annual meetings; handles the day to day activities of the association (deals with management, vendors); signs contracts approved by the board; Secretary. (Unless performed by management). Maintains the association business records (corporate papers, contracts, correspondence, communications, insurance, owner files); records meeting minutes; responsible for producing newsletters. Treasurer. (Unless performed by management). Maintains all of the financial records and documents of the association; May or may not be signatory on financial accounts of the association; Responsible for all financial accounts (checking, savings, CDs, etc); Reports income and expenses to the board. Ideally, the directors and officers provide the leadership to adequately protect and enhance the association’s and owners’ property through prudent administration. This requires careful planning and regular communication. BACK
Avoiding Conflict of Interest A conflict of interest is "a situation in which a person such as a public official, employee or board member has a personal interest sufficient to influence the objective exercise of official duties." There are three key elements in this definition: Personal Interest. Often this means a financial interest, but it could mean providing a special advantage to a spouse or child. Taken alone, there is nothing wrong with pursuing personal interests like changing jobs for more pay or helping your daughter improve her golf game. The problem comes when this personal interest comes into conflict with the second feature of the definition: Official Duty. By stepping up to a directorship, you acquire obligations to the association and the other owners. These obligations are supposed to trump personal interests. Influences Objectivity. Conflicts of interest interfere with objective judgment. A major reasons people value professionals is that they expect them to be objective. Personal interest that interferes with that objectivity is a matter of legitimate concern. So it is also extremely important to avoid "apparent" and "potential" as well as "actual" conflicts of interests. An "apparent" conflict of interest is one which objectivity is likely to be compromised. A "potential" conflict of interest may develop into an actual conflict of interest. With this in mind, consider five types of conflicts of interest identified by political scientists Ken Kernaghan and John Langford (using homeowner association examples): 1. Self-Dealing. As Board President, you arrange to have your unit painted first even though others need it more or you hire your son to do association landscaping work. 2. Accepting Benefits. You accept an all expense paid trip to Cancun from the association’s painting contractor. Money kick backs qualify as well. 3. Influence Peddling. A board member solicits benefits in exchange for using influence to get a particular vendor’s contract approved. 4. Using Association Property for Personal Use. Usually called "stealing"...taking office supplies and postage or using association equipment for a personal project. 5. Using Confidential Information. A board member discovers a structural dry rot problem that will cost many thousands of dollars per owner to repair. Instead of disclosing the problem, the director quietly resigns and puts his unit up for sale. How do you determine if you are in a conflict of interest situation? The proof is whether the situation is likely to interfere with your independent judgment as a director. Try the "Trust Test". Ask "Would the owners trust my judgment if they knew I was in this situation?" Trust is at the ethical heart of this issue. Conflicts of interest involve the abuse of trust. The Trust Test suggests a way of dealing with a conflict of interest called "disclosure". If we disclose what might influence our judgment, others are informed and can be on guard. But disclosure is not enough. Board members are expected to avoid conflicts of interests. So in the case of potential self-dealing, the smart director abstains from participating in the discussion or voting. Since conflict of interest can cloud objectivity, it’s often easier to see it in others rather than in one’s self. As a precaution, it’s wise to speak to a friend or colleague when in doubt. "Situational ethics" arise when loyalty is split or there are moral concerns that muddle the decision. "Whistle blowing" is an example of when a director must choose between loyalty to a director (and personal friend) who is embezzling. Conflicts of interest can rear their ugly head at any time. Be vigilant and
prepared to respond quickly and appropriately.
Top Ten Mistakes 6. Violating the Fair Housing
Amendments Act ("FHAA"). The FHAA prohibits enforcing certain types of
rules and covenants that have the effect of discriminating against an
individual’s familial status or preventing disabled residents from enjoying
their home to the same extent as non-disabled residents. For example, rules
that state "no children may skateboard on driveways" violates the FHAA because
it discriminates against children. Stating "No skateboarding on driveways"
instead would avoid this. The FHAA requires HOAs to make reasonable
accommodations for disabled residents. Allowing a disabled resident to keep a
service animal is a reasonable accommodation. Enforcing rules is at best a disagreeable part of HOA governance. If it’s to be done, do it right the first time, do it consistently, do it in writing and keep good records. Excerpts from an article by www.HindmanSanchez.com BACK
Committees 101 There are three types of committees: mandatory, standing and ad hoc. Mandatory committees are "mandated" in the HOA’s governing documents which means if they state that "there shall be a Nominating Committee", the board must appoint a Nominating Committee that complies with the functions detailed in the governing documents. Standing committees exist indefinitely or until the board decides their purpose is no longer needed. Standing committees have ongoing and often repetitive tasks to accomplish. These committees may be mandated in the governing documents but typically are created by the board to fulfill a continuing need, such as a landscape or maintenance committee. Ad Hoc committees are established and appointed by the board of directors for a specific purpose or a project. These committees are usually dissolved after the task is accomplished. Standing committees and ad hoc committees are formed by board resolution which states the committee’s powers and responsibilities. The powers of a committee are generally advisory only and limited to research, investigation, obtaining proposals and submitting recommendations to the board. An exception to this rule is the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) which is often authorized to make decisions on behalf of the HOA concerning architectural and design requests. The board is not obligated to accept a committee’s recommendations or decisions (in the case of the ARC) although should consider carefully before rejecting recommendations or overturning a decision (in the case of the ARC). Rejecting or overriding a committee can have a demoralizing effect if not handled with tact. No matter which type of committee is developed, it is important for the board to establish guidelines (also known as a committee charter) which describe each committee’s marching orders which include:
Some examples of committees and (type) are: Governing Document Review (ad hoc). If the documents are old and conflict with federal or state statute, this committee can work with the HOA’s attorney to bring them into compliance. If there is a proposal, say, to add rental restrictions, this committee can research the issue, poll the members and present recommendations to the board. Architectural Review Committee (mandatory or standing). This committee is often created because of a mandate in the governing documents to review and control new construction or renovation projects to ensure compliance with HOA design and material standards. The responsibilities can be substantial and complex. Education (standing). This committee is charged with educating the members about HOA functions, responsibilities, rules and regulations. It could arrange programs or communicate by way of the HOA’s website and newsletters. Research & Development (ad hoc). Researches a specific project assigned by the board. Maintenance (standing). Screens maintenance requests from owners before authorizing the work to be done; quality checks work by contractors. Financial/Budget (ad hoc). Formed annually to review and recommend the coming year’s budget. Social (standing). Often given a budget to execute a number of events each year which draw members together. Communication (standing). Creates or oversees the newsletter, website and informational flyers to keep the members informed. Landscape (standing). Quality checks the landscape contractor; makes recommendations concern landscape improvements, tree pruning/removals. Welcoming (standing). Contacts new residents and provides need-to-know HOA information. Rules & Regulations (standing). Recommends rules for better control or enforcement; issues rules citations. Nominating (mandatory or ad hoc). Reviews and recommends board candidates for elections. Neighborhood Watch (standing). Educates and organizes residents for improved security. Pool/Clubhouse (standing). Supervises use or rental of facilities; sometimes does maintenance and cleaning. Community Relations (standing). Communicates to media to promote the HOA. The board’s choice of committee chair is very important. The chair should be organized and have leadership skills to guide the committee toward its stated goals in the time frame allowed. As volunteers, committee members are covered under the HOA’s Directors & Officers liability insurance. This coverage is most likely needed for the Architectural Review Committee when its decision is legally challenged by a member whose proposal has been denied. Most other committees typically make only recommendations to the board and let the board make final decision. Besides benefitting the board by assisting in the work load, committees are an excellent training ground for future board members. The structure and goal orientation of a committee is similar to that of the board. Effective committees are run by goal oriented leaders, the kind of folks every board needs. Committees create a structure for those volunteer efforts which benefit the board, manager and community. Adapted from an article by Joanne L. Willoughby BACK
8 Components of a Rule The following
eight characteristics of good rules will help board members avoid the traps of
complexity and misunderstanding. To write an
effective rule, the board must balance specificity with simplicity and
compliance. No rule will meet each criteria equally.
Carrot or Stick Rules Carrotizing the rules takes thought and sensitivity. The "my home is my castle" mind set makes people resistant to picky and overbearing authority of Stick Rules. Some basic concepts in HOA rulemaking include: 1. All rules should be enacted sparingly.
The board should not involve itself in rule making that is normally handled by professional law enforcement. The police are far better equipped to handle drug dealers, out of control parties and domestic disputes. All such complaints should be referred to law enforcement by the parties most directly offended, the neighbors. When it comes to HOA rule enforcement, it can sometimes seem that it’s "who you know" that determines who gets enforced upon and who doesn’t. If a rule is worthy, it should be enforced on everyone, including board members and their friends. This way, the board doesn’t have to fight the arguments that so-and-so violated the same rule and nothing happened or that the board is immune from prosecution. One misconception is that the board is somehow an "eye in the sky" looking for rule violations and smiting offenders. While there should be a regular process for certain violations like identifying and removing junk vehicles or cars blocking a fire lane, many rule violations are triggered by a resident who files a complaint. The board is not required to mount daily patrols to catch evil-doers. When a resident files a rule complaint, the enforcement process should require the complainer to inform the offender and ask for correction prior to handing the matter over to the board. All complaints should be made in writing by the complainer either by email or mail. Avoid taking complaints over the phone. It’s too easy to make phone calls at all hours of the night. Require that the details be put in writing or don’t accept the complaint. No HOA rule article would be complete without discussion of the Three Ps: People, Pets and Parking. These are the biggest bones of HOA contention. Dealing with them correctly requires detailed rules.
Parking Rules Pet Rules The board needs to take great care in developing Three P Rules because there are often many moving parts and someone is bound to get offended along the way. That’s not a reason to not have them, just expect blow-back and make sure the rule is carefully thought through and being adopted for the greater good. To gain the greatest rule compliance, always always always circulate proposed rules to the members for a minimum 30 day review period. This way, all are put on notice and given a chance to vent and buy in. Carrotizing rules means less smiting and more compliance encouragement. All rules enacted should reflect the intent to improve neighbor relations. Living in close proximity is the norm in HOAs requires some degree of personal sacrifice. But the sacrifice is more palatable when the goal is the common good. As the great philosopher Bugs Bunny crooned, "Eating carrots is divine, you get a dozen for a dime, it’s maaaaagic!" For sample rules, see Policy Samples section. BACK |
© Copyright by Regenesis.net
All rights reserved