Ask the HOA Expert Q&A
Articles may be reprinted in their entirety but must include:
"Used with permission
from
Regenesis.net"


Board Spending
Question:  Our board often spends money outside of the scope of our governing documents. What can we do to control this?

Answer:  Why is the Board spending money outside of its authority? Are the documents vague on what the association is responsible for? If this is the case (and it often is), the Board needs to establish clear guidelines on what the association will, or won't, spend money for.

This can be accomplished be enacting an Areas of Responsibility resolution that divides specific maintenance responsibilities between homeowners or the association. Once approved, the Board should filter all spending decisions through the approved policy. Occasionally the Board may want to override the policy but, as a rule, it should serve in 99% of all cases.

It’s also imperative that the Areas of Responsibility policy be distributed to all homeowners so they are put "on notice". It has the added benefit of clarifying insurance responsibility so that owners are buying the right type of insurance.

Question:  I don't feel the Board spends money in our best interests. I protest by withholding payment until year end. Recently, I received a notice saying if I didn't pay, they would put a lien on my home. Can they do this? Am I wrong to protest this way?

Answer: Withholding assessments in protest is not the way to get your point across and, yes, the Board has both the right and duty to process collection on delinquencies. I assume your concerns are for the community as a whole and not for personal issues. Your points and solutions should be made in writing to the Board. Whether they act on them or not is another question. If they don't and you feel strongly that they should, I encourage you to run for election so that you can have a direct affect on the outcome. It's every owner's duty to serve.  BACK


Special Assessments vs. Borrowing
Question:
We are a 16 unit community. We have decided to renovate our 27 year old irrigation system and replace the existing landscape at a cost of $32,000. We are undecided as to whether or not to seek a loan for this project, make a special assessment or both. Which way should we go?

Answer: Loans usually make sense for major renovation projects that cost each owner $10,000 or more and that have a recognizable benefit to future owners. While $2,000 each is not insignificant, it is manageable. Also, lenders are usually interested in loans of at least $100,000 or more and the application work and cost to package a loan is fairly significant.  I suggest you do a special assessment for this one and if you haven’t performed a reserve study to plan for other periodic maintenance and replacements, invest in one now as well.  BACK


Board President Authority
Question:
Recently the President of the Board requested a written legal opinion regarding an Architectural Review question without consulting the Board. Is this allowable?

Answer: The President has the authority to make decisions on behalf of the association unless it involves an extraordinary issue and cost which clearly require Board or owner approval. If legal costs are budgeted for (and they should be) and the particular cost relatively small, the President has the right to do what was done.  BACK


Special Assessment Responsibility
Question:
One of our owners recently defaulted on a special assessment and our attorney advises that the rest of us are liable for paying for it. Is this right?

Answer: Unfortunately, there is no magic money and if one owner defaults, the rest are on the hook until the debt is paid. Fortunately, the association has the right and should pursue aggressive collection on the defaulting owner. At minimum, a lien should be filed against the unit so that the association has some recourse to collect the debt. State law may allow foreclosing on the property but that makes sense only if there is enough equity to pay the association debt plus resale costs. You may also have the right to shut off common utilities like water and sewer as well. These actions should be handled through an attorney that specializes in homeowner association law.

Timely collections on delinquent account are critical. The longer delayed, the bigger the problem. BACK


Naming Names
Question:
Should homeowners be identified in rule violation or delinquency discussions at Board Meetings?

Answer: There is no faster way to generate community wide ill will than by humiliation tactics. The general rule is "innocent until proven guilty" and names should be kept anonymous. Even when guilt is confirmed, treat the offender with respect remembering that this is a neighbor and not a convicted criminal. Also, if something slanderous is said at the Board Meeting, there is always a chance the Board and Association could get sued. This is one area that showing them who's boss will never work. Tread carefully.  BACK


Board Authority to Add Costs
Question:
Our declarations state that the association's purpose is the maintenance of common areas (entrance and a retention pond) only. We're a small community and do not have a large operation budget. The board is planning social events via a newly formed social committee. Does the Board have the right to establish this committee and use assessments to support its activities?

Answer: The Board has the right to organize and appoint volunteer committees as appropriate. If committee events are being paid for out of the general fund and this is a new cost, the Board should get homeowner approval first. If there is no cost or the events are funded voluntarily by interested owners, no issue and no problem.  BACK


Service Dog Policy
Question:
   Our association has a long-standing, posted rule prohibiting dogs due to a history of barking and noise disturbance. A new owner requested she be allowed to keep hers claiming it was a "therapy dog". The board denied her request and she moved it in anyway. Any thoughts?

Answer:   While the board needs to make reasonable accommodations for seeing eye and hearing dogs, "therapy dog" is a new one and certainly a stretch. (Aren’t most pets kept for "therapy" reasons?) Since this pet owner had ample opportunity to know and understand the No Dogs rule and ignored it, it's right that the Board move forward with enforcement. However, these matters can get very costly if contested. Pets are like family and this one may be willing to go the legal distance...hiring a lawyer, etc. If so, it may be prudent for the Board to settle based on a medical exception. Sometimes practicality is the better part of valor.  BACK


Starting a Management Company
Question:
  I’ve been considering starting a homeowner association management company. Any advice?

Answer:  What? Are you crazy? (Just kidding). Homeowner association management is probably the most challenging form of property management there is and you need the best training you can get. CAI - Community Associations Institute offers a variety of management seminars, resources and designations. I suggest you join the organization and get properly accredited. Also, get your state's equivalent of a property management license.  BACK


Recording Comments at Homeowner Forums
Question:
   Our Board Meetings always begin with a 15 minute "Homeowner Forum". The Board Secretary says including the homeowner comments in the Board Meeting minutes is not appropriate. Comment?

Answer:  A Homeowner Forum is a wonderful way to include owners in the process. However, it is not technically part of a Board Meeting so the secretary is correct. But homeowner comments are noteworthy and should be recorded separately from the meeting minutes (unless the comments are inflammatory or libelous, of course). They, like the minutes, should be circulated to the other owners to encourage others to get involved.  BACK


Holding Executive Sessions
Question:
  As an owner, I frequently attend Board Meetings. The Board sometimes adjourns to "executive session" without identifying what issues will be discussed claiming Robert's Rules allows such "executive sessions" Is this so?

Answer: First, you should read your governing documents and state statutes to see what it says about Board Meetings and if the Board is even allowed to meet in Executive Session. Even if the statute is silent or the Board is permitted, executive sessions are often misused by Boards that want to exclude owners from otherwise open meetings. They should only be used for selected issues. In Oregon, they are allowed for:

1. Consultation with attorneys concerning regarding litigation or criminal matters;
2. Personnel matters, including salary negotiations and employee discipline; and,
3. Contract negotiation with third parties.

In other words, only a few highly sensitive topics should be used for executive session. All other matters need to be discussed in a formal Board Meeting.  BACK


Limiting Rentals
Question:
Our Board is considering amending the bylaws to prohibit rentals. Pros and cons?

Answer: There is a good reason for limiting rentals...More than 30% of the total occupancy can limit home loan options and make the homes difficult to sell. If units are difficult to sell, prices will drop.  However, rental restrictions can be very difficult to enact and administrate. The Board could easily get into a "cat and mouse" game with some owners who want to rent their unit.

Since rental restrictions restrict property rights, it’s a topic that definitely should be discussed at an annual or special meeting with all owners before moving forward. It calls for a bylaw amendment which requires approval of the required number of owners defined in your governing documents. See also the articles "Renter Rights" and "Limiting Rentals".   BACK


Nominating Committee Control
Question:
Our Board selected a Nominating Committee which chose only the current Board members as candidates. Six additional residents wanted to run, but their names were left off the ballot. The Committee claims it selected the best for the community. With numerous mail-in ballots these people don't stand a chance. Is this legal?

Answer: The Nominating Committee's job is to identify good candidates for director positions but they should never interfere with the nomination or election process. That sounds like something that would happen in some third world dictatorship (or Florida).  ALL nominees should be included on the ballot.

Mail-in ballots are not recommended unless there is a huge percentage of absentee owners because this precludes nominations at the meeting. As you say, if many ballots are already cast by mail, floor nominees don't stand a chance. The alternative is to mail a proxy to all owners which authorizes an appointee who attends the meeting to vote on an absent owner's behalf. The proxy appointee could be a relative, neighbor, a board member or anyone of legal age.

This Board and Nominating Committee needs a stern reminder about the democratic process.  BACK


Restricting Signs in the Common Area
Question:
Does the association have the right to restrict home security system signs in the common area outside of the homes?

Answer: The association usually has the right to limit signs in the common area and what is placed in home windows. Small security stickers on the window are usually allowed. The main concern is curb appeal. Uncontrolled signage creates a cluttered look and reduces property values.  BACK


Reserving for Landscaping
Question:
Should we include landscape items in our Reserve Study plan? How about insuring trees?

Answer: It’s wise to include "Landscape Renovation" and "Treework" in the Reserve Study. All bushes and trees have a limited life. Bushes die and outgrow their location. While trees usually have a long life, they require corrective pruning that should be done every 3 - 5 years and is expensive. Hiring an arborist to do a comprehensive inventory and report of the trees also makes a lot of sense. If each tree is tagged and referenced in the report, maintenance can be easily tracked. Consistent corrective pruning will extend the lives of the trees and keep them looking good.

Insurance for non-income producing trees provides limited coverage for claims related to fire, lightning, explosion, riot, aircraft, vehicles, vandalism and theft. Most of the claims are related to vehicle damage. Wind, freezing and pest claims are not honored. And the insurance does not actually insure the trees for value but provides replacement in standard nursery sizes. In other words, that wind fallen 80 foot Douglas Fir will probably get you an 8 foot replacement. Based on the coverage available, $5000 coverage will cover quite a few replacements.

To avoid the possibility of insect infestation, use native trees that are hardy and pest resistant. If you already have those prone to insects, consult with an arborist for the proper preventive maintenance or cut them down and replacement them.   BACK


Maintaining Owner Add-ons
Question:
In years past, the Board has either sanctioned or failed to stop illegal additions by owners to their units such as expanded decks, fences, awnings and patio enclosures. The unwritten understanding has been that the unit owners that install these things are responsible for all repairs and replacements. Over time, however, new owners have acquired some of the units and are now demanding that the HOA pay for the work since it’s located in the common area. What now?

Answer: The Board has no authority to expand an owner’s use of the common area. Any redefinition or reconfiguration of common area must be approved by an appropriate majority of owners which may be 100% depending on how your governing documents read. However, what is done is done. If the policy has been that the owners that have installed the additions pay for all maintenance and repair, that should be the policy now and the current Board should take inventory of all owner additions and advise those unit owners of their maintenance responsibilities.

To avoid misunderstandings, any unit that is so affected should have a document recorded on the title describing the addition and the owner’s maintenance responsibility. This same principle applies to future modification approvals by the Board.  BACK


Audits Between Managers
Question:
When changing management companies, should an audit of the books be done?

Answer: It's always a good idea to have the books audited at change of management. The new company may insist on it or, at least, not take any responsibility for financial reporting of transactions that took place under old management. An audit is a good idea when there is a total change in the Board as well.

If the Board has been reviewing regular financial statements and has verified that the information was accurate (for example, the Treasurer has been comparing financial statements to the bank statements) and bills paid have been reviewed and approved by the Board, it may be okay to skip an audit, but the bigger the budget, the bigger the likelihood of problems.   BACK


Blocking Amendments
Question:
Our Board President often opposes and blocks bylaw amendment proposals. Can he do that?

Answer: Any HOA member (whether director or general) can propose a bylaw amendment. Bylaw amendments must be approved by the appropriate majority of general members. The board has no authority to amend the bylaws on its own. And the Board President has no power to block an amendment proposal on his own. He, of course, is entitled to his own opinion and is free to express it. He is not entitled to hold the HOA hostage because of his office. The Board President serves at the pleasure of the other board members. If he is being difficult, the other directors can remove him from office.   BACK


Replacing Unit Appliances
Question:
Can the Board decide to replace unit dishwashers and assess the owners?

Answer: A condominium unit belongs to its owner and the HOA cannot take on this kind of expense unless every individual owner agrees to it. It often makes financial sense, however, for the HOA to arrange group buying for owners. For example, in some states, exterior windows are a unit owner's responsibility to replace. If the building has old, single pane aluminum windows, it makes enormous sense for the HOA to coordinate a full window replacement project because individual owners could save up to 50% of the cost. Similarly, having the HOA purchase many dishwashers at once will doubtless save owners a lot of money. However, the HOA cannot force an owner to participate and some might opt out for any reason.  BACK


Hardwood Floors
Question:
We live in a four story building. Is there any law that prohibits installing hardwood floor because of sound transmission problems?

Answer: There is no law that restricts installation of hardwood flooring although some governing documents might prohibit it. Most new construction designs anticipate the noise issue and the desire for hardwood flooring, so install concrete subfloors to address noise transmission. In older buildings without concrete floors, this can definitely be a real problem for downstairs neighbors.

In these buildings, hardwood flooring would definitely create a noise problem if it was installed without proper sound dampening. To safeguard all owners’ quiet enjoyment, it is perfectly within the Board's authority to require hardwood flooring include sound dampening. There are several sound dampening materials that can be used including cork and Mass Loaded Vinyl  (see www.soundproofing.org/infopages/flooring.htm).

The Board should research alternatives and adopt a standard for such installations. Once adopted, the information should be made known to all owners and that failure to comply will result in an order to remove the flooring.   BACK


Group Contractor Meetings
Question:
The board wants all contractors together at the same time to walk the property and discuss the project to be done. Is this an ethical practice or should we meet with each separately?

Answer: It makes a lot of sense to have a joint walk through. It will save time for all concerned, all questions get answered at the same time and all bidders get the same information to craft their bids.   BACK


Temporary Parking Rules
Question:
Our parking rules do not allow boats to be parked in driveways. However, some folks need to park their boat for a day or two to clean it before taking it to the lake or storage. Is it reasonable to give permission to residents to park their boats for a short time if they first ask? We have a similar situation with RVs, storage containers and construction dumpsters.

Answer: Rather than trying to micromanage these kinds of things, the board should revise the parking policy to allow parking of boats, storage containers and construction dumpsters for a specified period of time. The neighbors will let the board know if the time limits are being abused.   BACK


Publishing Delinquencies
Question:
Our board publishes a list of delinquent members each month in the HOA’s newsletter. Is this proper?

Answer: Distributing a list of this kind is a very bad idea. It’s akin to the humiliation of the stocks and pillary. But today, it could get the board sued for libel. There are also good and practical reasons for not doing this:

1. All delinquencies are not created equal and not all delinquents are deadbeats. There could be legitimate extenuating circumstances like job loss, disability, divorce, etc.
2. The account might be paid or paid down by the time the list is distributed which makes the information wrong.
3. These are neighbors. Humiliating them is bound to buy long term resentment.

The board should cease this action immediately. If they insist on publishing a list of delinquencies, the amounts, days overdue and action taken will suffice. Names and addresses are unnecessary.   BACK


Developer Mismanagement
Question:
We are in a new HOA where the developer and his employees are still "the board". They are not paying much attention to financial reporting, make decisions without asking or telling us. They use HOA money for what seems to be "developer costs" such as certain landscaping costs to dress up the HOA for sales purposes. It seems like the fox is in the hen house. Is there anything we could do or must we just wait for their time to be up?

Answer: Developers that control the board always have a conflict of interest. They have homes to sell and having them look nice will help move them. However, if the developer is paying for his marketing costs (like enhanced landscaping) out of HOA fees, you have a right to cry "FOUL"! If the developer wants to add flowers and other eye candy that the HOA normally would not do, he needs to pay for it out of his developer marketing budget.

If you are paying HOA fees, you are entitled to see monthly financial (income and expense) reports that detail how that money is being spent. If the developer is allowing things that are clearly prohibited in the governing documents, again, current owners have the right to hold him accountable. The developer is not above the law when it comes to following the governing documents, rules and regulations that other owners are required to follow.

I suggest that you gather owners and compose a letter to the developer listing specific concerns and what you would like to see happen. This makes your complaints a matter of record. If the developer ignores your reasonable requests, a letter from an attorney may be necessary. Smart developers know that once the HOA is turned over to a board of owners, bad things could happen if he has not acted reasonably. Let’s hope this one gets the message the first time.   BACK


Good Neighbor Fence
Question:
We are planning to rebuild a wood boundary fence. When the original fence was built, we had no neighbors but now we do. We received a complaint from our neighbor that our fence was "illegal" because the "bad side" of the fence was facing them. Can our defense in this matter be that we are restoring the original fence design and are grandfathered?

Answer: You have a golden opportunity to improve neighbor relations by building a "good neighbor" style fence which looks the same from either side. It costs a bit more than a board fence but maybe the neighbor would be willing to share in the extra expense or even pay 50/50. Even if they don’t, the small increased cost is a great way to improve relations. Win-win. You can find specifications for a Good Neighbor Fence in the Specifications section.   BACK


Wind Chime Noise
Question:
We have a unit owner who installed a large wind chime on his balcony. We have received a number of complaints about the noise. How can we approach him about this?

Answer: Complaining about a wind chime sound seems pretty extreme but if your location is given to frequent wind, the sound could get loud and obnoxious. If this is the case, wind chimes, just like loud music are subject to the "nuisance" restriction which exist in virtually every HOA. This owner needs to remove the wind chime or install one that is small and less noisy.   BACK


Changing Annual Meeting Date
Question:
We recently changed the date of our annual meeting to three months later than in the past one. Two director terms expire this month. Is there some protocol to follow to keep them on until the annual meeting?

Answer: Directors terms are tied to the annual meeting which conforms to their term (one, two or three years). Changing of meeting date doesn’t change their term of office. This time around, it will simply be three months longer.   BACK


Front Yard Vegetable Gardens
Question:
Do you have an opinion about front yard vegetable gardens? Our governing documents only restrict "noxious use of property" and "unsightly growths".

Answer: The board has the authority to enact reasonable standards to preserve property values. Generally speaking, HOAs should have standards when it comes to landscaping which restricts vegetable gardens to backyards or out of view from the street to promote curb appeal.   BACK


Changing Repair Responsibility
Question: Our homeowner association has 30 single family detached homes. Our governing documents were basically written for townhomes. One of the bothersome issues is that the governing documents state that the HOA is responsible for replacing roofs, painting, gutters and other things that are commonly done with condominiums. Many owners object to building up a reserve fund to pay for repairs that may be as much as 20 years or more down the road.

The covenants also state that the board cannot special assess for anything other than common area improvements. So that leaves us with pretty much the options of building up the reserve fund or changing the governing documents. Can you provide us some sample wording for a single family home HOA that would allow homeowners to pay for major repairs themselves but would allow the board architectural control of those repairs?

Answer: While it’s unusual for a single family HOAs to do exterior maintenance, repairs and replacements, it’s not unheard of. I doubt that the developer made a mistake on this since it’s a huge issue. And it’s doubtful that you can muster the votes to change this which may take 100% of the owners to approve it including their mortgagees. You need to consult with a knowledgeable attorney to determine the requirements. If it is possible, the attorney can assist the board with the proper wording of the amendment.

So barring you pulling off a major governing documents amendment, yes, you need a reserve plan that includes a funding plan to collect money systematically from each owner every year. The 20-year-down-the-road thinking is flawed. While a reserve event like a roof may take place 20 years down the road, the reserve plan will only charge each owner a share of the future cost directly proportional to the benefit received. For example, if a particular owner owns for five years and sells, he would only pay 5/20ths of the future roof cost. He only pays for the benefit received and not a penny more. It’s like refilling the tank of a rental car. This is the fairest way to fund future costs.
  BACK


Hard Times Collections
Question:
Our board is being badgered by a delinquent owner because his account was turned over to collection. In hard economic times, should the board back off of collections?

Answer: As long as the board is enforcing collections uniformly, consistently and fairly, it is the board’s responsibility to enforce the Collection Policy regardless of circumstance or economic climate. There is no government bail-out for HOAs.
  BACK


Determining Management Fees B
Question:
Is there an average that HOA management companies charge for managing a homeowner association? How do they base their fees...by size, number of units, expectations, etc.? Do they usually charge a flat fee or percentage? How do they charge for maintenance, as a flat fee, by the job, etc.?

Answer: Percentages are not used to determine HOA management fees. Commonly, the management fee is expressed as the cost “per door”. But behind the per door concept is an analysis of how much time it takes the management company to execute the routine duties described in the Management Agreement. This can vary a lot from HOA to HOA. And within the fee structure, there is usually several levels and costs of service included in the routine duties like management, accounting and general office services (mailing, making copies, etc.).

Maintenance and repairs are charged over and above the basic duties on an hourly or bid basis. So, for a management company to make a profit, an annual estimate of all the levels of service multiplied by their hourly charges multiplied by the number of hours for each plus a profit margin equals the annual cost of management. Keep in mind, however, that most Management Agreements provide for extra charges for non-routine tasks like assisting in insurance claims, arranging contractor bids and performing special tasks or investigations requested by the board.
  BACK


Purging Names from Minutes
Question:
We recently read that names should not be included in the minutes. Can we legally go back over the past few years and strike the names from the minutes which have already been approved?

Answer: The minutes should contain names of board members and guests that take part in the meeting. As a matter of fact, it is extremely important that names be included when votes are taken. The minutes should record who makes a motion and who seconds it. If a board member voted against something that he felt was not in the HOA’s best interest, it is entirely appropriate to record his name as a dissenting vote if he requests it.

If you are talking about recording names of delinquent owners in the minutes then the matter is entirely different. It is best to refer to delinquencies in the minutes only by amount and collection status (30 days past due, etc.). Should you go back and sanitize such names from the minutes? No. The minutes have been approved and distributed in their current form. Changing them would raise suspicions that other parts have been changed or deleted. Let sleeping dogs lie. But make sure in the future not to include names of dogs like these that might come back and bite you.
  BACK


Approving Parking Rules
Question:
Could a parking enforcement rule be approved by an HOA board without the approval of the owners? The governing documents clearly state that "any additional rules can enacted by the board if deemed prudent and appropriate". We have never had much of a parking problem in our community and it seems that the board is just making rules because of a few violators. Is this considered "prudent and appropriate"?

Answer: The board generally does have the power to enact rules that are in keeping with the governing documents. However, it is highly advisable for the board to run all proposed rules passed the members for review prior to enacting them. If the rule is not supported, the board should not enact it. And it is not appropriate to enact a rule because of a few violators. Rules should only be enacted when there is frequent and ongoing violation of issues that affect resident livability, safety and property values.
  BACK


President Voting Proxies
Question:
Our HOA recently had an annual meeting where 12 owners were represented in person and the remaining 12 by proxies which were given to the board president to vote. This has happened at past annual meetings as well and because of this, his voting block carries every issue. Our HOA has become a dictatorship and we have no voice.

Answer: A proxy grants someone else the authority to act on another’s behalf, in this case, at the annual HOA meeting. Much of this particular issue has to do with how the proxies are worded to begin with. Generally proxies should allow the proxy giver several options like:

Option 1. I assign my voting rights to [blank] (This could be anyone of legal age, even a non-owner.)
Option 2. I assign my voting rights to one of the directors of the board who is not running for election. (Proxies thus marked are distributed equally among the qualifying directors).
Option 3. I give this proxy for quorum purposes only. My voting rights are not assigned to anyone.

Having such wording clearly allows more discretion to the proxy giver than a proxy that states only “I assign my voting rights to the president of the board.” If this is the wording on your proxy, It clearly is a setup to keep the current president in control and needs to be changed now. If it is not written this way and merely leaves a blank to be filled in, the president could go door to door and ask each owner to write his name on their proxy. But other members (including you) could do the same thing. If your proxy is written this way, I suggest you gather as many proxies as possible before the next Annual Meeting and start making changes in this dictatorship.
  BACK

© Copyright by Regenesis.net
All rights reserved