Ask the HOA Expert Q&A
Articles may be reprinted in their entirety but must include:
"
Used with permission from Regenesis.net"


Rules Enforcement Procedure
Question: 
What is a good procedure for rules enforcement?

Answer:  Having a long list of rules is usually not advisable but the Board has the authority to enact reasonable rules and procedures when necessary. The Resolutions Process is a great way to define the complex issues. Resolutions can be used to address things like collections, architectural control, pets and parking. Resolutions enacted by the Board should include:

1. Clear explanation of the issue
2. Consequences for failing to obey
3. Appeal process
4. Review by the association attorney
5. Review by the owners before enactment by the Board.  BACK


Maintenance Request Forms
Question:
Do you have a suggestion for a maintenance request form?

Answer: Three part carbonless forms work well. The original for the file, one copy for the owner and one copy for the maintenance person. I highly recommend using email because the request is filled out by the owner and can be moved quickly along to maintenance, management and accounting.  BACK


Appearance Rules
Question:
Our rules state: "No clothing or other household fabrics shall be hung in the open." I took this to mean clothes lines would not be permitted. Can the Architectural Committee interpret this to mean that clothes lines are permitted as long as they are in the back yard?

Answer: Rules like this are intended to control the curb appeal standard for the community. The rules tend to soften if the offending issue is relegated to the back yard, presumably out of sight. While the Architectural Committee does have the right to interpret the rules, it does answers to the Board. If you disagree with their interpretation, talk to the Board.  BACK


Tree Huggers
Question:
Our homeowner association has a running battle about trees. Some view any tree as a nuisance and would prefer to cut them all down. I’m a tree hugger who considers trees an asset to be preserved and protected. Can you discuss the value and care of trees?

Answer: Trees are one of an association's biggest assets and should not be removed without compelling cause. But some do need to be removed from time to time. For more, read the article entitled "Politics of Trees" which will be of some assistance. There are several other tree articles in the same section.  BACK


Leak Repair Responsibility
Question:
The landscape contractor destroyed part of my downspout. A work order was turned in to the management company and I was given a completion date which came and went. A month later, we experienced heavy rains and the missing downspout allowed water to enter and damage my basement. I called for emergency repairs and was told I would have to wait. I paid for the repairs to the downspout and basement myself and I am billing the association for reimbursement. Am I within my rights?

Answer: The association is not automatically responsible for damage to your unit. For example, if torrential rains caused the gutters to overflow and flood your basement, the damage would be yours to repair and claim should be filed with your insurance. Under the scenario you describe, however, the management company (the association’s agent) obviously failed to respond in a timely manner. This failure resulted in damage which rightly should be paid by the association. Of course, the Board may have an issue with the management company for failure to respond but that’s another Q&A.  BACK


Voting Majority
Question:
Our governing documents read that we need to have 2/3 of the members to vote "yes" in order to amend the documents. Is failure to respond considered a "yes" vote?

Answer: Failure to vote does not qualify as a "yes" vote. 67% is a relatively high threshold so it’s important to tally every vote, yea or nay. If voting by mail, there may be a number of ballots that aren’t returned for one reason or another. Those owners should be called and reminded or the ballets picked up. If a meeting is held to discuss and vote on an amendment, each owner should be complete and return a proxy in advance of the meeting designating someone that is authorized to vote on their behalf if unable to attend. The combined total of attendees and proxies can usually produce the 67% needed to pass the amendment.  BACK


Assessing by Volume
Question:
I live in a 60 unit condominium association in one of four which have loft space. Recently, the board decided to increase the assessments for the lofts because of "volume" considerations. Can they do that?

Answer: The assessment allocation is described in your governing documents and cannot be changed without (usually) 100% of all owners agreeing. Some attorneys are of the opinion that even the lenders may have the right to vote since reallocating assessments impacts their collateral. Bottom line, the Board is not authorized to make changes in the allocation on its own. Another mistake that is commonly made is splitting special assessments equally when regular monthly assessments are not equal. The same formula should be applied to special assessments as with the regular assessments.  BACK


Comparing Assessment Levels
Question:
As a Realtor, I’m unsure how to compare similar properties that have very different monthly assessments. When I show one property with $135/month fees then another at $250/month, the buyers get confused. How should I advise them?

Answer: As a real estate counselor, you need to know what is included in the monthly assessment. One critical element of comparing monthly assessments is reserve funding. All homeowner associations should have a 30 year reserve study done to identify future repair and replacement costs and have a regular monthly funding plan to pay for those events. A properly done reserve study will eliminate the need for special assessments for predictable events.

If the higher assessment includes reserve funding and the other doesn’t, it may actually be a better deal. I’d recommend that the buyer only consider homes in HOAs that have a funded reserve plan to guarantee no special assessments. Those that are properly funding reserves usually handle other business responsibly as well.  BACK


Board Training Resources
Question:
I own a condo and will be taking over the presidency of the association. What information do you recommend?

Answer: Fortunately, there are numerous options at Regenesis.net including:

  • Newsletter Basics with informative articles.

  • Videos: The Board, Meetings, Insurance, Welcome Home and Reserves. They are excellent.

  • Review our Books section, especially the ones marked "Recommended". Some may be available in the local library.

  • Join the local chapter of CAI-Community Associations Institute. Membership offers many resources for Board Members and Property Managers.  BACK


Pet Rule Enforcement
Question:
  Our Board has failed to consistently enforce pet rules: Dogs run loose and owners don’t clean up their (the dogs’) mess. Any advice?

Answer:  Pets are among The Three Ps that vex homeowner associations (People and Parking are the other two). The issues you mention are common and somewhat of a moving target. Sometimes the pets aren’t even resident but come from elsewhere. Cat owners can be among the worse offenders as they often feel their pets should be able to roam freely. A cat owner once told me that cats are "liberated" animals under the law. (Can you believe it?)

Whether dog, cat or iguana, all pets need to be properly cared for, supervised and restricted from roaming. First, it’s important to have clear pet standards. Suggest to the Board that one be adopted and circulated. After 60 days, identify those residents that ignore the policy and begin a "squeeky wheel" campaign. Be nice about it. Remember, these are neighbors.  BACK


Personal Items in Common Area
Question:
  We have residents decorating or storing personal property in the common area. For example, bird feeders have been hung that attract rodents. What should we do?

Answer:  The Board should be flexible when it comes to decorating the patios and decks as long as it doesn't damage the buildings in any way. Flower pots and wind chimes are commonly allowed. Personal property storage should not be allowed either on decks, patios or common area. If bird feeders are causing a rat problem, regardless where they are, they should be banned for health reasons. They and other personal items in the common area should be removed without warning after written notice to all residents that such is the policy.   BACK


Shifting Maintenance Responsibility
Question
: Our homeowner association is undergoing a major exterior renovation. The Board has decided to limit the Association's maintenance responsibility to one half of the labor costs for any structural damage discovered. Affected unit owners are expected to cover the remaining half of labor costs and all the material costs. The governing documents state that the exterior maintenance is the Association's responsibility. Is this appropriate?

Answer: This "half enchilada" approach was doubtless hatched by the Board because of a lack of reserve funds to address the whole enchilada. But there are several BIG problems in it. If the governing documents say that the association is responsible for exterior maintenance, that what it means. That also includes structural damage related to exterior problems. Also, it penalizes individual owners for repairs that should be paid by all owners. Lack of money does not justify shuffling off association responsibilities to individual owners.

If there isn't enough funds in reserve, a special assessment needs to be floated to raise the remaining amount. To prevent shortfalls in the future, the Board should have a Reserve Study done to analyze the long term repairs and costs like roofing, painting and paving. It’s imperative that the Board prepare for predictable and expensive events.   BACK


Rebuilding Fences
Question:
Our property line fence is in need of repair and our governing documents say that the responsibility belongs to the homeowner. Our neighbor demands that we not rebuild on the property line and wants a different style of fence. And the City requires a fence design that is contrary to our Architectural Design Guidelines. Help!

Answer: It seems this neighbor is the tail wagging the dog. They don't propose to pay the cost but want to call the shots. The Architectural Review Committee (or Board of Directors if there isn’t one) should determine the look and location of the fence. I suggest you make a written request to the Committee for both the fence style and property line location subject to being built according to city building code standards. The neighbor has no right to demand it be moved to a new location unless it is actually encroaching on his lot. Fences rightly belong on the property line.   BACK


Appealing Rules
Question:
Our Board seems to make up rules as they go such as: "No bike riding is permitted on the street" and "A limit of 2 pets per family" (including fish!) These rules were not in place when I bought my home and were never discussed with the homeowners before they were passed. Do I have any rights?

Answer: Yes, you definitely have rights as a homeowner. While the Board has the authority to make reasonable rules (emphasis on "reasonable"), rules work best when the governed understands and is in general agreement with them. If a rule is not reasonable, you have the right to question it. Generally, a small number of homeowners can request a special meeting to discuss such things. Check your governing documents for the percentage required to call a meeting.

It’s very important that the Board not forget they are neighbors as well as officers. Rule making should be done thoughtfully and respectfully. The Board should explain and justify why a rule is needed. For example, bikes are usually not banned from city streets. Why should they be banned from the association streets? Is there some extraordinary situation that warrants it?   BACK


Composing an Agenda
Question: Would directors getting together prior to a meeting to discuss the agenda be considered a business meeting? Can an board meeting be held without establishing a quorum?

Answer: Putting an agenda together does not constitute a formal meeting as long as no business decisions are made. If a quorum of directors is not achieved, a legal meeting cannot be held and business should not be transacted.   BACK


Paying Directors
Question:
We have been paying our Board President $200/month for work outside his job description. OK?

Answer: Aside from the fact that your governing documents probably prohibit paying directors, there is a conflict of interest. Since the President is the chief officer, he authorizes his own pay. And who supervises him? Are federal and state withholding, unemployment and workers comp insurance guidelines being followed? He is, after all, an employee if he’s being paid. For a variety of legal and practical reasons, this arrangement should end. The board’s job is to supervise. If the association needs work done, it should hire a professional.   BACK


Attracting Stray Pets
Question:
Yesterday I found a litter of cats on my back patio left by one of the many strays that wander the community. There are several unit owners who feed them and we are developing a regular colony. They are a nuisance _ spraying and tearing up gardens, caterwauling, etc. Suggestions?

Answer: Pet lovers often have tunnel vision when it comes to pets and trying to reason with them may be difficult. Send a non-accusatory letter to all residents about the issues and the consequences. Most people will understand and comply. The rebels may need fines and charging costs for professional removal of cats attracted to their feeding.   BACK


Restricting Investor Ownership
Question: I manage a large unit condominium complex. Several years ago, the board tried to pass a rental restriction and did not get the member votes needed. Now, in light of the foreclosure crisis, investors are buying foreclosed units and renting them out. We have one homeowner who is in the process of buying his fourth unit. Can an HOA limit the number of units owned by a single entity? And how does this affect our association as a whole?

Answer: Yes, the HOA can limit rentals but it is subject to an appropriate vote of the members as defined by the governing documents which may be a super-majority (2/3 or 3/4) or even unanimous. Of course, the more rentals you have, the tougher it will be to get the vote. But now, lenders are more closely scrutinizing the number of rentals within condominiums. FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac all impose rental restrictions on loans they insure (FHA) or underwrite (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). FHA’s limit on rentals is 15% and 49% on the other two. Since these entities are responsible for the lion’s share of condo loans, failing to adhere to the rental restriction limits could severely compromise the ability to sell or refinance a unit.   BACK


Failure to Reserve
Question:
Our board has been badly managed for years.   The building was built over 25 years ago and previous boards did not believe in reserving for major repairs. As a result, we are now faced with huge costs for roofing, decks, fences, on and on.  I’d like to survey the owners and ask them to prioritize what needs to be done. 

Answer: Asking for owner input to prioritize maintenance is asking for trouble. Most will ask that something that affects them personally be fixed first. That’s human nature.  Instead, the board should develop a plan, share the plan with the members and ask for comment. That way, the board leads with input from the members.     BACK


Voting on Rental Restrictions
Question:
Our owners approved by 75% a rental restriction amendment to the governing documents. The vote was contested in court and the judge determined that this amendment needed 100% approval. Should the board appeal?

Answer: Rental restrictions are often considered a fundamental property right by the court. Once the matter is put before a judge, anything can happen and, in this case, did. Whether the HOA should appeal is a matter of cost and likelihood of prevailing. A fair amount of money and emotion has probably already been expended. The board should not spend any more of the HOA’s money unless the 75% majority is supportive of spending more in the way of a special assessment.   BACK


Special Rules for Rentals
Question:
I have owned a rental condo for years. The board recently adopted a policy that rental owners must submit copies of rental agreements to the board, pay a $200 administration fee and that the rental agreement must be for a duration of 12 months or more. Can the HOA legally require a copy of a private rental contract? Can the HOA dictate the terms of the rental agreement on a property they do not own? Can the HOA charge an administration to rental owners only?

Answer: It is reasonable for a unit landlord to provide the board a copy of the Rental Agreement for emergency contact information purposes. It is also reasonable for the board to require that all renters are subject to the same rules and regulations as owners. So, the Rental Agreement should include a copy of the HOA Rules and Regulations and make violation of them subject to fine and/or eviction.

However, the board has no authority to single out landlord owners for special fees unless those fees are based on actual costs incurred by the HOA. Sometimes a Move In/Move Out fee is charged because the entry code, mailbox tag and additional janitorial is required to clean up after a move. However, owners move as well as renters. If there is cost incurred by the HOA, it should be charged to both owners and renters. Landlords should not be singled out for special treatment or charges.

The board cannot require a specific rental term other than, say, all rental terms must be "a minimum of six months" versus "short term (nightly)" such as those that take place at resort locations. Many state statutes prohibit Rental Agreements longer than 12 months.   BACK


Resigning from the Board
Question:
A board member sent an e-mail to the board stating, "I submit my resignation to the board." The management company advises that it is not an official resignation until the board accepts it. Is that the case?

Answer: Directors are elected by the members and do not need the board’s approval to resign. If a director quits, all she needs to do is communicate that to the board and it’s done. It’s now up to the board to appoint a replacement unless the annual meeting is happening very soon, in which case, a replacement can be elected.   BACK


Role of Manager at Meetings
Question:
What the role of an HOA Manager at a board or annual meeting?

Answer: The role of the manager at a board meeting is to keep the board apprised of HOA business by giving a manager's report. That report should include maintenance accomplished or recommended, contractor issues, rules violations and actions, collection report and actions taken and rule/policy recommendations. The manager should request authority or guidance on issues that fall outside of the Management Agreement. The manager should not take meeting minutes since it distracts from the manager’s advisor role. Taking minutes is the Secretary's job.

The Annual Meeting is a whole different story. The manager should arrange and process the Meeting Notice and proxies, arrange the venue and check in procedure. The manager should respond to questions from the board and members.   BACK


Odor Nuisance
Question:
We have a unit owner who is distressed over an odor that happens late at night and prevents her from sleeping. A board member paid her a visit and believes the neighbor might be smoking marijuana. Should the board get involved?

Answer: It’s not up to the board to track down and deal with every disturbance, particularly if it involves criminal activity. However, this activity may actually be legal if the resident has an approved "medical marijuana" permit available is some states. Regardless, if the neighbor is smoking marijuana, a direct communication with the neighbor is appropriate to discuss the matter. Like cigarette smoke, marijuana can adversely affect the health of others and there is no Constitutional protection to engage in it.   BACK


Resisting Reserves
Question:
Our HOA consists of townhomes built 25 years ago. The majority of the residents are seniors. Bylaws require the HOA to pay for all exterior maintenance and repairs. The members resist monthly fees greater than the immediate expenses because "I don’t want to leave any money on the table when I sell." So, we currently have a low reserve fund and are now facing large roof and painting expenses. The board plans to special assess to pay for the work. Can a unit owner "opt out" of the special assessment by declaring he will replace his own roof and paint when he decides it is needed?

Answer: If the HOA is responsible for maintaining the roof and paint, no owner has the right to "opt out" nor does the board have the authority to give up the HOA’s responsibility to do the work. The board should press on and do what the governing documents said it should.

However, your HOA desperately needs a reserve study so that the board can properly plan for repairs and collect money for reserves without special assessments. Special assessments are the result of poor or no planning and unfair to those that have to pay them. See Reserve Planning at www.Regenesis.net.   BACK


Mandating Unit Plumbing
Question:
I read your article Going Green and you make no mention about conserving water inside residents’ homes like replacing old toilets with high efficiency toilets. Toilets are often the biggest water user in a home. Residents could conserve up to 70% of their water consumption by installing a dual flush toilet. There are high efficiency faucets available too.

Answer: Great points. While the HOA generally cannot require unit owners to install particular fixtures or equipment, logically it should when the HOA pays the water and sewer bill. Leaking toilets can waste thousands of gallons a year. So monitoring the water bills closely is imperative by comparing the current cycle with the same cycle for the prior year (and from period to period) to detect significant and unexplained increases.

Your local water utility can provide average consumption figures for comparable properties. If your HOA uses a lot more than the average, it’s time to do a leak detection audit. Some leak detection techniques are incredibly cheap. For example, toilet leak dye kits are available for 50¢ each. Simply drop a dye tablet in the toilet tank. If the water in the bowl changes color, you’ve got a leak. This test can be easily performed by individual residents. Leaks in the main water supply lines can often be detected by acoustic detection equipment. Call a plumber.

When it comes to upgrading units to water efficient fixtures (toilets, faucets and shower heads), it may be more expedient and practical for the HOA to fund the process since doing so could cut water and sewer bills in half. The savings alone could justify the expense since the payback period is often very short. And once the conversion cost is repaid, it’s a gift that keeps on giving.    BACK


Prohibiting Second Homes
Question:
Our governing documents prohibit "Secondary Residences". Is there a common definition of "Secondary Residences"? Does it make any difference if it is used for guests or workers or whether the unit is being rented out?

Answer: A secondary residence is one used by the owner as a vacation or part time home. As secondary implies, the owner has a primary home elsewhere where he lives most of the time. Secondary residences are not used for rental purposes. If they are, they are considered investment or rental property. Some HOAs have restrictions on rental property.

It is very unusual to control occupancy based on secondary residence. It probably has to do more with failure to maintain the landscaping which can affect neighboring property values. Of course, even full time residents can fail to maintain their landscaping. As long as the property is properly maintained, this restriction seems arbitrary.   BACK


Opting Out of Special Assessments
Question:
Our condominium composed of twenty units in five buildings was built twenty years ago. The majority of owners are seniors who resist paying fees greater than the immediate expenses because, as one put it, "I don’t want to leave any money on the table when I die." So, we have a low reserve fund and are facing a special assessment to do roofing and painting. Owners of one building got together and requested to be opted out of the special assessment stating they would do roofing and painting when they felt it was necessary. Is this legitimate?

Answer: If the homeowner association is responsible for replacing common elements, no owner has the right to "opt out". The board should press on and do what the governing documents said it should. Also, your HOA desperately needs a reserve study so that the board can properly plan for these kinds of repairs and collect money for reserves without special assessments. Special assessments are the result of poor planning and unfair to those that are forced to pay them.

And the thinking of leaving money on the table is flawed. Money contributed to reserves is held in trust to pay for future events. Each contributor pays a share relative to the benefit they received. For example, if a member owns a unit for 60 months, he pays a 60 month share of those future reserve costs. Another member that owns for 30 months pays a 30 month share. Future owners pay there fair share too. Each pays according to the benefit received.   BACK


Squelching a Muckracker
Question:
We have a member that likes to rile up other members with misinformation about an ongoing renovation project. He holds special meetings in the clubhouse to report his "findings" which inevitably make the board look bad. Can we deny him use of the clubhouse for his smear campaign?

Answer: Maintain the high ground and don’t try to control this individual. Members are entitled to use the clubhouse for meetings if they like. The more you try to control this individual, the more fuel you provide for his fire. Of course, if he is inviting members to attend his meeting, board members are members too and could attend to correct misinformation he might be ladling out.  It’s a good idea to provide the members with regular progress reports on the renovation project to help kill the rumor mill.   BACK


Delegating Meeting Responsibilities
Question:
Our board president has many wonderful qualities, however, he lacks composure when confronted by irate members at meetings. Being aware of his own shortcomings, he delegated running the meeting to the vice president who is well versed in parliamentary procedure. Our documents state that the president presides over meetings. Does "preside" mean run the meeting or that the buck stops with him?

Answer: "Preside" means runs the meeting. The vice president takes over for the president only when the president is unable to attend the meeting. The president should not otherwise delegate his duties to avoid conflict. The real solution to this issue is to establish clear rules of conduct at board meetings. The board meeting is designed for the board to discuss and decide HOA business. If the meeting is being disrupted by non-board members, those members need to be told not to interrupt or be asked to leave. Don’t let the tail wag the dog.   BACK


Prohibiting Faith Based Groups
Question:
A Bible study group was given permission to have meetings in the clubhouse. A Jewish culture club was also given permission to conduct activities there. Both groups were told that there could be no formal services, no proselytizing and no open prayers. The HOA lawyer suggests that this is a free speech issue and the restrictions are not proper. Do you have any comments on the best way to handle it?

Answer: The clubhouse is designed for use by members and their guests. As long as the HOA allows member groups to reserve the facilities for private meetings, there should be no restriction on the subject matter. The Bible, Torah, Koran etc are not banned books (in the United States at least). Faith based groups should be given equal access along with other groups and should not be restricted what they say (scripture, prayers) because, your attorney is correct, it is a matter of free speech.

As a private entity, the HOA could enact a policy to restrict access by all private groups. But this would be throwing the baby out with the bath water. The clubhouse is there to be used. If a group's legal activity interferes with other members' enjoyment, the HOA could provide for a group's exclusive use and charge rent which would benefit all members.   BACK

© Copyright by Regenesis.net
All rights reserved